Monday, December 29, 2008

The concept of GOD.

Before I commence, I would like to clarify that these are purely my personal views on the subject (more like thinking aloud) and anybody likely to be hurt by a discussion on the concept of God is advised to please stop reading any further.

The belief or non belief in God is at best, well, a belief. Everyone is entitled to one and what I am stating may not be agreeable to most. However I am hoping that people agree with some one who said (Voltaire I guess) something to the effect “I may not agree with what you are saying, but I would defend till the last drop of my blood your right to say it”.

I am keeping the first edition of this discussion simplistic in nature and I would talk about the commonest perception of God held by most. For most, God is a celestial being who has no beginning and no end and who is all knowing, all present, formless and infinite and so on and so forth.

I believe in Nature and not in a God per se. According to me the world operates on natural laws. If you throw a ball up in the air it will come down irrespective. All the Gods of this world can’t prevent one simple ball from falling. Miracles do not exist. Everything has an explanation or will get one. Every event in life can be explained according to rules of Nature. Some might say that I am referring to God here as Nature. I disagree. Some say Ok, then who created these laws of Nature (God who else?). I ask then, if there is a God, who created that God? The answer to that question can also be applied to the previous question i.e. who created the laws of Nature

I have seen most people fervently to pray to God for their wishes to come true (want a child, a promotion, save me from the present danger, etc). There are Gods known for their potency in delivering the goods (granting wishes). People put rings on their fingers, ashes on their foreheads, holy threads on their wrists, Crucufixes around their neck etc towards this end. But people have a tendency to remember wishes that have been fulfilled and tend to forget wishes that are unfulfilled. If a thing is left to chance, there is a 50% chance of it being fulfilled and hence wishes are fulfilled fifty percent of the time. But if one has a fervent belief in the presence of a God then s/he is likely to forget the remaining times where wishes remained unfulfilled.
Fervent wishing does no good. It is actions based on established laws of Nature / scientific principles that yield results. I saw my father gasp and die in front of my eyes while I looked on helplessly. At that time I had prayed, wished like never before, wished from the core of my being to save my father. But when a large enough clot blocks the pulmonary artery, the heart stops beating and no amount of praying helps. Law of nature. Period.

As is obvious, I was a believer and now I have ceased to be one. But that puts me at a serious disadvantage. I just threw away the crutch that sustains the majority of humankind through all kinds of stressful times. The biggest (and only) advantage believers have is that they have something to turn to when nothing else seems to work. And if a superstition helps, well, who am I to object. The same goes for palmistry, gemstones, sacred threads, chants, mantras etc. People jump when you mention God and superstition in the same breath. But these same guys won’t believe in the concept of ghosts or even the lochness monster or the snowman (Yeti). Strange!!

I have come to realize that the concept of God is somehow linked to fear. The fear of the unknown. The fear of what happens after death. Where science doesn’t have an explanation (yet), God steps in big time. When people couldn’t explain thunderstorms, the moon, the sun etc they invented a God for each and prayed that nothing bad befell them. But as science progressed gradually, these Gods disappeared one by one.

Before ending I leave you with a few questions:
  • Why do buses full of pilgrims fall into valleys with all passengers dying?
  • Why do people of all kinds (pious, irreverent, holy, unholy, good, bad) die in a nuclear blast a.k.a. Hiroshima / Nagasaki / wars?
  • Why do children die inside mother’s womb?
  • Why is there suffering on this earth?
That reminds me of a famous saying that either God is impotent (can’t relieve the countless sufferings on this earth) or else he is plain cruel (enjoys the suffering).

7 comments:

  1. loved it.. every bit of it..
    you are the best!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. For a moment I thought I am reading another 'God Delusion' from a Richard Dawkins inspired. With very careful thoughts I did embark on reading the whole article ignoring the author's word of caution and found it very interesting and stimulating.
    The questions raised at the end are very pertinent and I think the queries to some extent are looking at an equation between 'God' and 'godliness', which is indeed very complex. As I understand, the concept of God has got its own fallacies as much as 'the laws of Nature' have. Science [experimental thinking] and faith [belief or over valued idea] are like asymptotes and one can never be sure if they meet.
    On a lighter note, the non(God)believer would say that God blinked when all the pain and suffering happened/happens (and the believer may chose not to disagree).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Still there or vanished for 12 months again :-?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I was once asked by an American friend - why do you Indians have so many gods? I replied that we have a population over a billion, its too much work for one god to handle so now we have them at 1:1000.
    Jokes apart, loved what you had written as those were exactly my thoughts when Bapi passed away. But its shocking for me to know of your atheistic thoughts at this point as I had always known you as a strong believer of the hindu faith as compared to me. You always had retorts reasoning the existence of God and mythological events when someone would talk about their non existence.
    I agree - God or no God,nature is the only truth. But the fact remains that there are things that cannot always be explained by the laws of nature. Celestial or paraphysics/parapsychology men have always twisted and turned their logic to fit to their thoughts and explain things that can never be naturally explained - God maybe a figment of this logic. Human beings have always been fascinated about the existence of a superhuman being - no wonder we love superman, spiderman and the X-men ( and how can I foget Shaktiman - our very own Indian superhero). Speaking of X-men and mutants, maybe God is one,i.e., if he does exist. I can speak for hours on this topic but time and space wont permit for that. In short, loved what you wrote but totally denying a supreme power only makes us more helpless. We all end up doing what Amitabh ended up doing in Deewar, stand in front of the temple and say - "Aaj ...khush to bahot hoge tum ..."

    ReplyDelete
  5. I absolutely agree to the concept of God sited here. God is nothing but "the Nature". In "Bhagabat Gita", Work is said to be the teacher (Guru)of God (Nature). So when our work is good we get good and when it is bad, the result is bad. If any body works on a good plan and have faith on his own ability, success is no far.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Good one
    Nevertheless, many people need God just as many patients need placebos. Belief in God is not wrong as long as that does not lead to wrongs for others.

    ReplyDelete